I bridge the language gap between CFOs and platform engineers

I'm not a finance expert learning cloud. I'm a platform engineer who speaks fluent finance.

The Problem I Solve

Most organizations face a painful choice: Either they have financial control over cloud spending at the cost of engineering velocity, or they grant engineers the flexibility they need to innovate while cloud bills spiral into chaos.

The gap between finance and engineering creates a perfect storm. CFOs manage cloud spend in the dark, unable to explain month-to-month variances or tie costs to business value. Engineering teams feel constrained by financial processes that don't reflect technical realities.

Meanwhile, billions of dollars are wasted on avoidable cloud costs—overprovisioned resources, shadow IT spend, poor governance, compliance risks, and architectural decisions made without understanding their financial impact.

Real-World Experience

The 12 realities I've solved first-hand:

Cost visibility gaps
Forecasting unpredictability
Governance breakdowns
Hidden optimization opportunities
Billing complexity
Procurement strategy gaps
Finance system misalignment
Unclear ROI
Lack of anomaly detection
Finance-engineering misalignment
Compliance gaps
Uncontrolled shadow IT

I've seen every one of them firsthand. I've also fixed every one of them.


My Background

Early Career

Microsoft

Worked at massive scale, understanding how architectural decisions ripple across billions of operations.

Cloud Transformation

Centrify

Drove cloud transformation, architecting security-first cloud infrastructure for enterprise deployments.

VP Leadership

RMS & Moody's

Led global engineering teams delivering SaaS cloud infrastructure across multiple cloud providers at scale.

Through these roles, I learned something critical: cloud cost problems aren't really cloud problems. They're architectural problems, governance problems, process problems, and cultural problems.

$10M–$12M+
annual savings

Before: Uncontrolled cloud costs, reactive optimization, unclear accountability
After: Systematic cost reduction through architecture, governance, and cultural change

I watched those costs disappear not through one-time optimization exercises, but through systematic changes to how we architected systems, tagged resources, built accountability, and made decisions.

These weren't finance initiatives led by accountants. They were technical initiatives led by engineers who understood the business implications. That's when I realized: The most powerful FinOps solutions come from people who can operate credibly in both worlds.

That's why I started this consulting practice—to help more organizations solve these problems at scale.


What Makes Me Different

Most FinOps consultants come from either finance or engineering. I do both.

Platform-level cost governance

Platform-level cost governance

Others:Recommend tagging strategies
I:Design systems where cost allocation is embedded in CI/CD pipelines and IaC
Technical workload forecasting

Technical workload forecasting

Others:Extrapolate trends
I:Model underlying technical drivers—auto-scaling, data processing, load patterns
Real anomaly detection

Real anomaly detection

Others:Surface alerts
I:Implement platform-level monitoring and guardrails using observability best practices
Architecture-level optimization

Architecture-level optimization

Others:Provide generic advice
I:Trace cost to architecture and propose solutions rooted in deep infrastructure knowledge
Audit-ready compliance

Audit-ready compliance

Others:Manual reconciliation processes
I:Embed audit trails and compliance directly into infrastructure workflows
Centralized rogue spend management

Centralized rogue spend management

Others:Financial processes
I:Technical discovery and policy-as-code guardrails to funnel procurement

What I Believe

Teaching icon

Cloud costs shouldn't be a black box.

Teaching icon

Finance and engineering aren't adversaries—they're teammates who've been speaking different languages.

Teaching icon

The best optimization doesn't come from one-time cost reduction exercises; it comes from fixing root causes: how you architect systems, enforce governance, and allocate accountability.

Teaching icon

Real FinOps transformation happens when both sides understand the trade-offs and constraints they face. That's when sustainable improvements happen.


Who I Help Best

You are likely a fit if...

You're a B2B SaaS company in the $10M-$500M revenue range—large enough that finance and engineering operate as distinct teams, small enough to move quickly

You have significant cloud spend—potentially multi-millions annually

You lack clear ownership or governance over that spend

Your bills are unpredictable month-to-month

You know there's waste, but you can't pinpoint it

Finance and engineering point fingers at each other

If you're wondering whether your cloud cost problem is a technical issue, a financial process issue, or both—you're probably my ideal client.


How I Work

1
Diagnosis icon

Diagnose

Deep dive into cloud architecture, billing patterns, and organizational structure

2
Design icon

Design

Create solutions based on the full picture from both engineering and finance

3
Implementation icon

Implement

Build the systems and frameworks that actually stick—no PowerPoint only

4
Teaching icon

Teach

Transfer knowledge throughout—leaving you with capabilities you can sustain

Everything I do ties back to measurable business results: cloud spend reduction, improved forecasting accuracy, faster feature deployment, better compliance posture, reduced chaos and incidents. I track progress relentlessly and adjust approach based on what's working.

Ready to Take Control of Your Cloud Costs?

Cloud Spend Reduction
Predictable Forecasting
Audit-Ready Compliance

If you're managing cloud costs and wondering whether it's a technical problem or a financial process problem—or both—let's talk.

I offer a free 30-minute diagnostic consultation. We'll discuss your current situation, the specific pain points you're facing, and whether working together makes sense.

No sales pitch. All insight.